Car-PC Forum | Car computer support

Home / Small Talk / CALU vs. Voom [Viewed 5657 Times]

Back

CALU vs. Voom
By: trashy Rank: Starfleet Lieutenant, Junior Grade Postings: 8 From: n/a	Posted: Di Sep 19, 2006 - 06:39 Might be the wrong cat, but foung no fitting category: I am still planning my system, having 2 possibilities: 1. Voom Case + Commell Mainbord + M2 ATX + Celeron-M + RAM etc. 2. CALU M2C + Celeron-M + RAM etc. The big question is: Where's the difference? The Voom system is 80 euros cheaper, even if a add an external cdrom! So: what is different? Why isn't the calu system in the configurator? Differences i see so far: - cd-rom must be external for voom (even better) - calu has firewire (good, but 80 more euros?!?)
By: admin Rank: Starfleet Vice Admiral Postings: 463 From: Germany	Posted: Di Sep 19, 2006 - 11:19 >So: what is different? CALU is a bit smaller/compact. >Why isn't the calu system in the configurator? It is. Please look here : http://www.cartft.com/catalog/threeorbuilt2/carpc_intel
By: trashy Rank: Starfleet Lieutenant, Junior Grade Postings: 8 From: n/a	Posted: Mi Sep 20, 2006 - 10:14 That's all? A bit smaller for 80 euros? So the rest is the same? Boot time, power supply...? With regard to the passive aspect the equation smaller = better seems to be quite wrong in those extreme cases... Thank you anyway.